4.7 Review

Palladium(II)-Catalyzed Domino Reaction of 2-(1-Alkynyl)-2-alken-1-ones with Nucleophiles: Scope, Mechanism and Synthetic Application in the Synthesis of 3,4-Fused Bicyclic Tetrasubstituted Furans

期刊

ADVANCED SYNTHESIS & CATALYSIS
卷 351, 期 4, 页码 617-629

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adsc.200800715

关键词

cyclization; domino reactions; fused ring systems; palladium; synthetic methods

资金

  1. NSFC [20702015]
  2. Shanghai Shuguang Program [07SG27]
  3. Shanghai Pujiang Program [07pj14039]
  4. Shanghai Leading Academic Discipline Project [B409]
  5. [2009CB825300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Described herein is the development of a palladium(II)-catalyzed two- or three-component reaction of 2-(1-alkynyl)-2-alken-1-ones with nucleophiles and allylic chlorides. Various types of nucleophiles such as O-, N-, C-based nucleophiles and olefin-tethered O-, N-, C-based nucleophiles were investigated. The scope, mechanism and application of this Pd(II) -catalyzed domino reaction were studied. In these transformations, the palladium catalyst exhibits a dual role, serving simultaneously as a Lewis acid and a transition metal. Two possible reaction pathwavs (cross-coupling reaction vs. Heck reaction) from the same intermediate furanylpalladium species were observed. The reaction pathway is dependent on the property of the nucleophile and the length of the tethered chain as well. When olefin-tethered O- based nucleophiles were used., only the cross-coupling reaction pathway was observed, in contrast, both reaction pathways were observed when olefintethered C-based nucleophiles were employed. The product ratio is dependent on the length of the tethered chain. Furthermore, ring-closing metathesis (RCM) of corresponding furans with C=C bonds provides an easy method for the preparation of functionalized oxygen-heterocycles - 3,4-fused bicyclic furans. It is also noteworthy that allylic chloride can be as an oxidant besides its well known function as an alkylating reagent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据