4.7 Article

Microstructures and mechanical properties of ultrafine-grained Ti/AZ31 magnesium matrix composite prepared by powder metallurgy

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 29, 期 12, 页码 3241-3249

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2018.09.001

关键词

Nanocomposite; Magnesium alloys; Mechanical properties; Strengthening mechanisms; Powder metallurgy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51374085]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The microstructure of ultrafine grain for magnesium alloys can result in drastic enhancement in their room temperature strength, but the issue of low strength at elevated temperature becomes more serious as well due to grain boundary slide. Here ultrafine-grained Ti/AZ31 magnesium matrix composites with high strength at both room and elevated temperature were prepared by vacuum hot pressing and subsequent hot extrusion. The microstructure of the composite samples before and after consolidation processing was characterized, and the mechanical properties of the as-consolidated bulk samples were measured at room and elevated temperatures. The results indicate that after extrusion ultrafine-grained magnesium alloys were obtained and Ti particulates with particulate size of similar to 310 nm disperse in Mg matrix. The magnesium grain of AZ31-15at.% Ti grows from 66 nm to 800 nm. Meanwhile, the relative densities of Ti/AZ31 composites are higher than 99%. The yield strength (YS) of extruded AZ31-15at.% Ti composite at room temperature is 341 MPa, being 2.4 times higher than original AZ31 alloy. Theoretical estimation shows that remarkably enhanced room-temperature mechanical strength attributes to grain boundary strengthening with the contribution ratio of 74%. In addition, the peak stress of extruded AZ31-15at.% Ti composite at 573 K is 82 MPa and ultrafine Ti dispersions are responsible for the enhanced strength. (C) 2018 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据