4.5 Article

Conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell lines established from urine

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-RENAL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 298, 期 3, 页码 F557-F567

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00509.2009

关键词

focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; SV40 large T antigen; human telomerase

资金

  1. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [ZO1 DK043308]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sakairi T, Abe Y, Kajiyama H, Bartlett LD, Howard LV, Jat PS, Kopp JB. Conditionally immortalized human podocyte cell lines established from urine. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 298: F557-F567, 2010. First published December 9, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00509.2009.-Evidence suggests that loss of podocytes into urine contributes to development of glomerular diseases; shed podocytes are frequently viable and proliferate in culture conditions. To determine the phenotypic characteristics of viable urinary cells derived from human subjects, we established long-term urinary cell culture from two patients with focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and two healthy volunteers, via transformation with the thermosensitive SV40 large T antigen (U19tsA58) together with human telomerase (hTERT). Characterization of arbitrarily selected two clonal cell lines from each human subject was carried out. mRNA expression for the podocyte markers synaptopodin, nestin, and CD2AP were detected in all eight clones. Podocin mRNA was absent from all eight clones. The expression of nephrin, Wilms' tumor 1 (WT1), and podocalyxin mRNA varied among the clones, which may be due to transformation and/or cloning. These results suggest that podocyte cell lines can be established consistently from human urine. The generation of podocyte cell lines from urine of patients and healthy volunteers is novel and will help to advance studies of podocyte cell biology. Further improvements in the approaches to cell transformation and/or cell culture techniques are needed to allow cultured podocytes to fully reproduce in vivo characteristics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据