4.8 Article

Atomic Interlamellar Ion Path in High Sulfur Content Lithium-Montmorillonite Host Enables High-Rate and Stable Lithium-Sulfur Battery

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 40, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201804084

关键词

high sulfur content; lithium ion transport path; lithium-montmorillonite; lithium-sulfur batteries

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51722204, 51622208]
  2. National Key Basic Research Program of China [2014CB931702]
  3. Sichuan Provincial Fund for Distinguished Young Academic and Technology Leaders [2014JQ0011]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZYGX2016Z004]
  5. Sichuan Science and Technology Program [2018RZ0082]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fast lithium ion transport with a high current density is critical for thick sulfur cathodes, stemming mainly from the difficulties in creating effective lithium ion pathways in high sulfur content electrodes. To develop a high-rate cathode for lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries, extenuation of the lithium ion diffusion barrier in thick electrodes is potentially straightforward. Here, a phyllosilicate material with a large interlamellar distance is demonstrated in high-rate cathodes as high sulfur loading. The interlayer space (approximate to 1.396 nm) incorporated into a low lithium ion diffusion barrier (0.155 eV) significantly facilitates lithium ion diffusion within the entire sulfur cathode, and gives rise to remarkable nearly sulfur loading-independent cell performances. When combined with 80% sulfur contents, the electrodes achieve a high capacity of 865 mAh g(-1) at 1 mA cm(-2) and a retention of 345 mAh g(-1) at a high discharging/charging rate of 15 mA cm(-2), with a sulfur loading up to 4 mg. This strategy represents a major advance in high-rate Li-S batteries via the construction of fast ions transfer paths toward real-life applications, and contributes to the research community for the fundamental mechanism study of loading-independent electrode systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据