4.8 Article

Top-Down Approach for Nanophase Reconstruction in Bulk Heterojunction Solar Cells

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 26, 期 36, 页码 6275-6283

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201402182

关键词

bulk heterojunction; nanophase reconstruction; post-additive soaking

资金

  1. Core Technology Development Program for Next-generation Solar Cells at the Research Institute for Solar and Sustainable Energies (RISE) in GIST
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant - Korean government (MSIP) [2008-0062606]
  3. Advanced Photonics Research Institute (APRI) Research Program from the Basic Science Research Program of GIST
  4. National Research Foundation - Korean government Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2011-0006563]
  5. EI Project - Korean Ministry of Environment [ARQ20114000114 (401-112-014)]
  6. Ministry of Education, Science & Technology (MoST), Republic of Korea [gist-19] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  7. Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea [GIST-19] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  8. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0006563] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

'Top- Down nanophase reconstruction via a post-additive soaking process is first presented with various BHJ binary composites. By simply rinsing as-cast BHJ films with a solvent mixture containing a few traces of a nanophase-control reagent such as 1,8-diiodooctane, oversized fullerene-rich clusters (>100 nm in diameter) in the BHJ film are instataneously disassembled and entirely reorganized into finely intermixed donor/ acceptor nanophases (ca. 10 nm) with a 3D compositional homogeneity, without surface segregation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据