4.7 Article

Densification mechanism of Ti-based metallic glass powders during spark plasma sintering process

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 66, 期 -, 页码 1-7

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2015.06.010

关键词

Metallic glass; Viscosity; Powder metallurgy; Mechanical alloying and milling; Differential scanning calorimetry

资金

  1. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [S2013010012147]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2013ZZ0008]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University [NCET-11-0163]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Densification mechanism of Ti40.6Zr9.4Cu37.5Ni9.4Al3.1 metallic glass (MG) powder with different heating rates during spark plasma sintering process was investigated using annealed crystalline counterpart powder as the object of reference. Results show that compared with single-stage densification process in the whole sintering process for the annealed crystalline counterpart powder, MG powder contains a twostage densification process. Meanwhile, higher heating rate promotes obviously densification behavior for the both kinds of alloy powders. Further densification mechanism analysis based on Frenkel model indicates that the activation energy of the viscous flow for MG powder in the supercooled liquid region decreases with increasing heating rate, thus promoting densification behavior of the MG powder in the first stage. In contrast, for the annealed crystalline counterpart powder, the promoting densification behavior with increasing heating rate is attributed to the higher temperature gradient between the sample center and the edge. The variation in the viscosity of melt-solidified Ti40.6Zr9.4Cu37.5Ni9.4Al3.1 bulk MG with temperature at different heating rates confirms the correctness of the obtained densification mechanism in our case. The results obtained can provide a new insight to understand the advantage of MG powder in fabrication of nano/ultrafine-grained titanium alloys with nearly full density. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据