3.8 Article

Preliminary Results of Mismatch Repair Deficiency Screening via Immunohistochemical Staining in Young Asian Colorectal Cancers

期刊

PROCEEDINGS OF SINGAPORE HEALTHCARE
卷 19, 期 1, 页码 3-11

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/201010581001900102

关键词

Asian; HNPCC; immunohistochemistry; young colorectal cancers

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The incidence of mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency in young colorectal cancers (CRC) remains unknown in Asians. This preliminary study assessed the clinicopathological features and efficacy of screening for MMR protein deficiency in young Asian CRC patients. Methods: From January 2006 to October 2009, patients under the age of 50 with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining for MMR proteins in resected CRC specimens were retrieved from a prospective computerised database. Results: Eighty unrelated patients comprising predominantly 80% Chinese (n = 64), with median age of diagnosis at 41 years (range 22-50 years) had IHC performed. Twenty-three per cent (n= 18) of the patients had abnormal IHC staining. Loss of staining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins were observed in 18%, 2% and 6% of tumours respectively. Of the 15 patients who had abnormal staining of MLH1, three had concomitant equivocal staining for MSH6. One tumour specimen had abnormal staining in all 3 proteins. Multivariate analysis revealed that family history was the only significant predictive factor for defective MMR detection (OR 8.06, 95% CI 1.69-38.35, p= 0.002). However if Amsterdam criteria alone were to be used, 72% (n= 12) of the cohort would have not been detected for MMR gene defects. Conclusion: The overall burden of germline MMR deficiency in the Singapore population may be as high as 23%. Amsterdam criteria alone are insufficient to detect hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) related patients. The use of IHC staining of at least 3 MMR proteins is a useful screening strategy for HNPCC diagnosis and routine screening of mismatch repair deficiency may be recommended for all young Asian CRC patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据