4.7 Article

Structural stability of Fe-based topologically close-packed phases

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 59, 期 -, 页码 59-67

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2014.12.009

关键词

Density functional theory; Electronic structure; Phase stability; Ab-initio calculations; Mechanical properties, theory; Phase stability, prediction

资金

  1. ThyssenKrupp AG
  2. Bayer MaterialScience AG
  3. Salzgitter Mannesmann Forschung GmbH
  4. Robert Bosch GmbH
  5. Benteler Stahl/Rohr GmbH
  6. Bayer Technology Services GmbH
  7. state of North-Rhine Westphalia
  8. EU in the framework of the ERDF
  9. Philippine Department of Science and Technology Science Education Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Precipitates of topologically close-packed (TCP) phases play an important role in hardening mechanisms of high-performance steels. We analyze the influence of atomic size, electron count, magnetism and external stress on TCP phase stability in Fe-based binary transition metal alloys. Our density-functional theory calculations of structural stability are complemented by an analysis with an empirical structure map for TCP phases. The structural stability and lattice parameters of the Fe-Nb/Mo/V compounds are in good agreement with experiment. The average magnetic moments follow the Slater-Pauling relation to the average number of valence-electrons and can be rationalized in terms of the electronic density of states. The stabilizing effect of the magnetic energy, estimated by additional non-magnetic calculations, increases as the magnetic moment increases with band filling for the binary systems of Fe and early transition metals. For the case of FeNb, we demonstrate that the influence of magnetism and external stress is sufficiently large to alter the energetic ordering of the closely competing Laves phases C14, C15 and 36. We find that the A15 phase is not stabilized by atomic-size differences, while the stability of C14 is increasing with increasing difference in atomic size. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据