4.8 Review

Molecules on Si: Electronics with Chemistry

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 22, 期 2, 页码 140-159

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.200901834

关键词

-

资金

  1. Israel Science Foundation, ISF (Jerusalem)
  2. Schmidt Minerva Centre for Supramolecular Architecture
  3. Kimmel Centre
  4. US-Israel Binational Science Foundation
  5. National Science Foundation [DMR-0705920]
  6. Princeton MRSEC of the National Science Foundation [DMR-0819860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Basic scientific interest in using a semiconducting electrode in molecule- based electronics arises from the rich electrostatic landscape presented by semiconductor interfaces. Technological interest rests on the promise that combining existing semiconductor (primarily Si) electronics with (mostly organic) molecules will result in a whole that is larger than the sum of its parts. Such a hybrid approach appears presently particularly relevant for sensors and photovoltaics. Semiconductors, especially Si, present an important experimental test-bed for assessing electronic transport behavior of molecules, because they allow varying the critical interface energetics without out, to a first approximation, altering the interfacial chemistry. To investigate semiconductor-molecule electronics we need reproducible, high-yield preparations of samples that allow reliable and reproducible data collection. Only in that way can we explore how the molecule/electrode interfaces affect or even dictate charge transport, which may then provide a basis for models with predictive power. To consider these issues and questions we will, in this Progress Report, review junctions based on direct bonding of molecules to oxide-free Si. describe the possible charge transport mechanisms across such interfaces and evaluate in how far they can be quantified. investigate to what extent imperfections in the monolayer are important for transport across the monolayer. revisit the concept of energy levels in such hybrid systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据