4.8 Article

Liquid Metal Droplets Wrapped with Polysaccharide Microgel as Biocompatible Aqueous Ink for Flexible Conductive Devices

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 39, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201804197

关键词

conductive nanoinks; flexible electronics; liquid metals; marine alginate; microgels

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21474125, 51603224, 51608509]
  2. Chinese 1000 Youth Talent Program,
  3. Shandong Taishan Youth Scholar Program
  4. Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation [JQ201609, ZR2016EEB25]
  5. Shandong Collaborative Innovation Centre for marine biomass fiber materials and textiles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanometerization of liquid metal in organic systems can facilitate deposition of liquid metals onto substrates and then recover its conductivity through sintering. Although having broader potential applications, producing stable aqueous inks of liquid metals keeps challenging because of rapid oxidation of liquid metal when exposing to water and oxygen. Here, a biocompatible aqueous ink is produced by encapsulating alloy nanodroplets of gallium and indium (EGaIn) into microgels of marine polysaccharides. During sonicating bulk EGaIn in aqueous alginate solution, alginate not only facilitates the downsizing process via coordination of their carboxyl groups with Ga ions but also forms microgel shells around EGaIn droplets. Due to the deceasing oxygen-permeability of microgel shells, aqueous ink of EGaIn nanodroplets can maintain colloidal and chemical stability for a period of >7 d. Crosslinked alginate-gel with tunable thickness can retard the generation and release of toxic cations, thereby affording high biocompatibility. The soft alginate shells also enable to recover electric conductivity of EGaIn layers by mechanical sintering for applications in microcircuits, electric-thermal actuators, and wearable sensors, offering huge potential for electronic tattoos, artificial limbs, electric skins, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据