4.8 Article

Impact of Substrate and Processing on Confinement of Nafion Thin Films

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 30, 页码 4763-4774

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201304311

关键词

-

资金

  1. Fuel Cell Technologies Office, of the U. S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Fuel Cell Technologies Office through General Motors Corporation [DE-EE0000470]
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thin films of ion-conducting polymers are an important area of study due to their function in many electrochemical devices and as analogues for interfacial phenomena that occur in bulk films. In this paper, the properties of Nafion, a prototypical ionomer, are investigated as thin films (4 to 300 nm) on carbon, gold, and platinum substrates that are fabricated using different casting methods and thermal histories. Specifically, water uptake, swelling, and morphology are investigated by quartz-crystal microbalance, ellipsometry, and grazing-incidence X-ray scattering to develop structure/property/ processing relationships. For all substrates, as the films' thickness decreased, there is an initial decrease in swelling followed by a subsequent increase for film thicknesses below approximate to 20 nm due to a disordering of the film hydrophilic/hydrophobic structure. Decreased swelling and less structural order is observed on gold for spin-cast films compared to self-assembled films; the opposite effect is observed for films on carbon. The presented systematic data set and analyses represent a thorough study of the behavior of Nafion thin films on model substrates of interest in metal catalyst/carbon electrodes, and these insights help to elucidate the underlying polymer physics and confinement effects in these and related systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据