4.8 Article

Ultrasmall Graphene Oxide Supported Gold Nanoparticles as Adjuvants Improve Humoral and Cellular Immunity in Mice

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 44, 页码 6963-6971

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201401358

关键词

gold nanoparticles; biomedical applications; graphene oxide; cellular immunity; adjuvants

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51361130033]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2014CB965000]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences [SKLVEB2013KFKT010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adjuvants play an important role in vaccines. Alum and MF59 are two dominant kinds of adjuvants used in humans. Both of them, however, have limited capacity to generate the cellular immune response required for vaccines against cancers and viral diseases. It is desirable to develop new and efficient adjuvants with the aim of improving the cellular immune response against the antigen. Here, the feasibility and efficiency of ultrasmall graphene oxide supported gold nanoparticles (usGO-Au) as a new immune adjuvant to improve immune responses are explored. usGO-Au is obtained from reduction of chloroauric acid using usGO and then decorated with ovalbumin (OVA, a model antigen) through physical adsorption to construct usGO-Au@OVA. As the results show, the as-synthesized usGO-Au@OVA can efficiently stimulate RAW264.7 cells to secrete tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-), a mediator for cellular immune response. In vivo studies demonstrate that usGO-Au@OVA can also promote robust OVA specific antibody response, CD8(+) T cells proliferation, and different cytokines secretion. The results indicate that using usGO-Au as an adjuvant can stimulate potent humoral and cellular immune responses against antigens, which may promote better understanding of cellular immune response and facilitate potential applications for cancer and viral vaccines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据