4.8 Article

A Cruciform Electron Donor-Acceptor Semiconductor with Solid-State Red Emission: 1D/2D Optical Waveguides and Highly Sensitive/Selective Detection of H2S Gas

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 24, 期 27, 页码 4250-4258

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201304027

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSFC [21372226]
  2. State Basic Program and Chinese Academy of Sciences
  3. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021-147143]
  4. Sino-Swiss Science and Technology Cooperation
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_147143] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a new cruciform donor-acceptor molecule 2,2'-((5,5'-(3,7-dicyano-2,6-bis(dihexylamino)benzo[1,2-b: 4,5-b']difuran-4,8-diyl) bis(thiophene-5,2-diyl)) bis (methanylylidene)) dimalononitrile (BDFTM) is reported. The compound exhibits both remarkable solid-state red emission wand p-type semiconducting behavior. The dual functions of BDFTM are ascribed to its unique crystal structure, in which there are no intermolecular face-to-face p-p interactions, but the molecules are associated by intermolecular CN center dot center dot center dot pi and H-bonding interactions. Firstly, BDFTM exhibits aggregation-induced emission; that is, in solution, it is almost non-emissive but becomes significantly fluorescent after aggregation. The emission quantum yield and average lifetime are measured to be 0.16 and 2.02 ns, respectively. Crystalline microrods and microplates of BDFTM show typical optical waveguiding behaviors with a rather low optical loss coefficient. Moreover, microplates of BDFTM can function as planar optical microcavities which can confine the emitted photons by the reflection at the crystal edges. Thin films show an air-stable p-type semiconducting property with a hole mobility up to 0.0015 cm(2)V(-1)s(-1). Notably, an OFET with a thin film of BDFTM is successfully utilized for highly sensitive and selective detection of H 2 S gas (down to ppb levels).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据