4.8 Article

Ultrathin Graphene Nanofiltration Membrane for Water Purification

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 29, 页码 3693-3700

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201202601

关键词

ultrathin graphene membrane; nanofiltration; water purification; nanofluidics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51173162, 20974093]
  2. Qianjiang Talent Foundation of Zhejiang Province [2010R10021]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2011QNA4029]
  4. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20100101110049]
  5. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [R4110175]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method of fabricating ultrathin (approximate to 22-53 nm thick) graphene nanofiltration membranes (uGNMs) on microporous substrates is presented for efficient water purification using chemically converted graphene (CCG). The prepared uGNMs show well packed layer structure formed by CCG sheets, as characterized by scanning electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The performance of the uGNMs for water treatment was evaluated on a dead end filtration device and the pure water flux of uGNMs was high (21.8 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1)). The uGNMs show high retention (>99%) for organic dyes and moderate retention (approximate to 20-60%) for ion salts. The rejection mechanism of this kind of negatively charged membranes is intensively studied, and the results reveal that physical sieving and electrostatic interaction dominate the rejection process. Because of the ultrathin nature of uGNMs, 34 mg of CCG is sufficient for making a square meter of nanofiltration membrane, indicating that this new generation graphene-based nanofiltration technology would be resource saving and cost-effective. The integration of high performance, low cost, and simple solution-based fabrication process promises uGNMs great potential application in practical water purification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据