4.8 Article

Photosensor Device Based on Few-Layered WS2 Films

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 44, 页码 5511-5517

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201300760

关键词

low-dimensional materials; dichalcogenides; photocurrent; raman spectroscopy; tungsten

资金

  1. U.S. Army Research Office MURI [W911NF-11-1-0362]
  2. Materials Simulation Center of the Materials Research Institute
  3. Research Computing and Cyberinfrastructure unit of Information Technology Services
  4. Penn-State Center for Nanoscale Science
  5. JST-Japan
  6. Penn State Center for Nanoscale Science [DMR-0820404]
  7. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DE-AC02-98CH10886]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Few-layered films of WS2, synthesized by chemical vapor deposition on quartz, are successfully used as light sensors. The film samples are structurally characterized by Raman spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The produced samples consist of few layered sheets possessing up to 10 layers. UV-visible absorbance spectra reveals absorption peaks at energies of 1.95 and 2.33 eV, consistent with the A and B excitons characteristic of WS2. Current-voltage (I-V) and photoresponse measurements carried out at room temperature are performed by connecting the WS2 layered material with Au/Ti contacts. The photocurrent measurements are carried out using five different laser lines ranging between 457 and 647 nm. The results indicate that the electrical response strongly depends on the photon energy from the excitation lasers. In addition, it is found that the photocurrent varies non-linearly with the incident power, and the generated photocurrent in the WS2 samples varies as a squared root of the incident power. The excellent response of few-layered WS2 to detect different photon wavelengths, over a wide range of intensities, makes it a strong candidate for constructing novel optoelectronic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据