4.8 Article

Near-Infrared SERS Nanoprobes with Plasmonic Au/Ag Hollow-Shell Assemblies for In Vivo Multiplex Detection

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 30, 页码 3719-3727

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201203726

关键词

SERS nanoprobes; Au/Ag hollow-shell assembly; near-infrared detection; multiplex detection

资金

  1. Pioneer Research Center Program through National Research Foundation of Korea
  2. Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology [2012-0000460]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [2011-0027888, R32-2012-000-10213-0] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For the effective application of surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanoprobes for in vivo targeting, the tissue transparency of the probe signals should be as high as it can be in order to increase detection sensitivity and signal reproducibility. Here, near-infrared (NIR)-sensitive SERS nanoprobes (NIR SERS dots) are demonstrated for in vivo multiplex detection. The NIR SERS dots consist of plasmonic Au/Ag hollow-shell (HS) assemblies on the surface of silica nanospheres and simple aromatic Raman labels. The diameter of the HS interior is adjusted from 3 to 11 nm by varying the amount of Au3+ added, which results in a red-shift of the plasmonic extinction of the Au/Ag nanoparticles toward the NIR (700-900 nm). The red-shifted plasmonic extinction of NIR SERS dots causes enhanced SERS signals in the NIR optical window where endogenous tissue absorption coefficients are more than two orders of magnitude lower than those for ultraviolet and visible light. The signals from NIR SERS dots are detectable from 8-mm deep in animal tissues. Three kinds of NIR SERS dots, which are injected into live animal tissues, produce strong SERS signals from deep tissues without spectral overlap, demonstrating their potential for in vivo multiplex detection of specific target molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据