4.8 Article

Toward Strong and Tough Glass and Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Repair

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 44, 页码 5461-5476

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201301121

关键词

bioactive glass; ceramics; porous scaffolds; bone repair; tissue engineering; mechanical strength

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIH/NIDCR) [1R01DE015633]
  2. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The need for implants to repair large bone defects is driving the development of porous synthetic scaffolds with the requisite mechanical strength and toughness in vivo. Recent developments in the use of design principles and novel fabrication technologies are paving the way to create synthetic scaffolds with promising potential for reconstituting bone in load-bearing sites. Here, the state of the art in the design and fabrication of bioactive glass and ceramic scaffolds that have improved mechanical properties for structural bone repair is reviewed. Scaffolds with anisotropic and periodic structures can be prepared with compressive strengths comparable to human cortical bone (100-150 MPa), while scaffolds with an isotropic structure typically have strengths in the range of trabecular bone (2-12 MPa). However, the mechanical response of bioactive glass and ceramic scaffolds in multiple loading modes such as flexure and torsionas well as their mechanical reliability, fracture toughness, and fatigue resistancehas received little attention. Inspired by the designs of natural materials such as cortical bone and nacre, glass-ceramic and inorganic/polymer composite scaffolds created with extrinsic toughening mechanisms are showing potential for both high strength and mechanical reliability. Future research should include improved designs that provide strong scaffolds with microstructures conducive to bone ingrowth, and evaluation of these scaffolds in large animal models for eventual translation into clinical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据