4.8 Article

Multi Variant Surface Mounted Metal-Organic Frameworks

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 30, 页码 3790-3798

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201202996

关键词

metal-organic frameworks; thin films; quartz crystal microbalances; adsorption kinetics; liquid phase epitaxy

资金

  1. German Research Foundation (DFG) [SPP 1362]
  2. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  3. China Scholarship Council (CSC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hybrid surface mounted metal-organic frameworks (h-SURMOFs) of multi variant core-shell (cs) and core-shell-shell (css) structures (SURMOF A-B and A-B-C, A: [Cu-2(bdc)(2)(dabco)]; B: [Cu-2(NH2-bdc)(2)(dabco)]; C: [Cu-2(ndc)(2)(dabco)], bdc = 1,4-benzenedicarboxylate; NH2-bdc = 2-amino-1,4-benzenedicarboxylate; ndc = 1,4-naphtalenedicarboxylate; dabco = 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane) with specific crystallographic [001] orientation and incorporated amino groups at a controllable depth within the bulk are deposited via liquid phase epitaxial (LPE) approach on pyridyl-terminated self-assembled monolayers (SAM). The location of the (amino) functionality can be precisely controlled through tuning the thickness (number of deposition cycles) of each sub-multilayer block according to the LPE deposition protocol. The chemo-selective and location-specific post deposition (chemical) modification of the amino groups in the cs and css-type h-SURMOF samples is achieved. The h-SURMOFs allow one to probe functional groups at certain location in the volume of hybrid MOF crystallites attached to surfaces as thin film coatings. Multiplex adsorption kinetics of FPI (FPI = 4-fluorophenyl isothiocyanate) is observed in h-SURMOFs due to their multi-variant pore structures in samples of A-B and A-B-C. Conceptually, the stepwise LPE growth method enables fabrication of hybrid SURMOFs and incorporation of multi-variant functionalities into one homogeneous thin film material, providing precisely tunable pore environment for selective adsorption, separation, etc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据