4.8 Article

Gecko-Inspired Controllable Adhesive Structures Applied to Micromanipulation

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 1246-1254

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201101783

关键词

gecko-inspired materials; dry adhesion; micromanipulation; soft robotics; elastomeric stamps

资金

  1. NSF [CMMI-1130520]
  2. Claire and John Bertucci Fellowship
  3. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1130520] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gecko-inspired angled elastomer micropillars with flat or round tip endings are presented as compliant pick-and-place micromanipulators. The pillars are 35 mu m in diameter, 90 mu m tall, and angled at an inclination of 20. By gently pressing the tip of a pillar to a part, the pillar adheres to it through intermolecular forces. Next, by retracting quickly, the part is picked from a given donor substrate. During transferring, the adhesion between the pillar and the part is high enough to withstand disturbances due to external forces or the weight of the part. During release of the part onto a receiver substrate, the contact area of the pillar to the part is drastically reduced by controlled vertical or shear displacement, which results in reduced adhesive forces. The maximum repeatable ratio of pick-to-release adhesive forces is measured as 39 to 1. It is found that a flat tip shape and shear displacement control provide a higher pick-to-release adhesion ratio than a round tip and vertical displacement control, respectively. A model of forces to serve as a framework for the operation of this micromanipulator is presented. Finally, demonstrations of pick-and-place manipulation of micrometer-scale silicon microplatelets and a centimeter-scale glass cover slip serve as proofs of the concept. The compliant polymer micropillars are safe for use with fragile parts, and, due to exploiting intermolecular forces, could be effective on most materials and in air, vacuum, and liquid environments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据