4.8 Article

Microribbon-Like Elastomers for Fabricating Macroporous and Highly Flexible Scaffolds that Support Cell Proliferation in 3D

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 23, 期 3, 页码 346-358

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201201212

关键词

scaffolds; tissue engineering; macroporosity; hydrogels; elastomer; flexibility

资金

  1. Donald E. and Delia B. Baxter Foundation
  2. McCormick Faculty Award
  3. Stanford Bio-X Interdisciplinary Initiative grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogel-based scaffolds are widely used for culturing cells in three dimensions due to their tissue-like water content and tunable biochemical and physical properties. Most conventional hydrogels lack the macroporosity desirable for efficient cell proliferation and migration and have limited flexibility when subject to mechanical load. Here microribbon-like elastomers that, when photocrosslinked, can form macroporous and highly flexible scaffolds that support cell proliferation in 3D are developed. These microribbons are produced by wet-spinning gelatin solution into microfibers, followed by drying in acetone, which causes asymmetrical collapse of microfibers to form microribbon-like structures. Gelatin microribbons are then modified using methacrylate anhydride to allow further photocrosslinking into 3D scaffolds. The macroporosity and mechanical properties of the microribbon-based scaffold may be tuned by varying wet-spinning rate, drying temperature, choice of drying agent, level of glutaraldehyde crosslinking, and microribbon density. When encapsulated in the microribbon-based scaffold, human adipose-derived stromal cells proliferated up to 30-fold within 3 weeks. Furthermore, microribbons-based scaffold demonstrate great flexibility and can sustain up to 90% strain and 3 MPa stress without failing. The unique mechanical properties of microribbon-based scaffolds make them promising tools for engineering shock-absorbing tissues such as cartilage and intervertebral discs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据