4.8 Article

Protamine Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Stem Cell Labeling and In Vivo Raman/Magnetic Resonance/Photoacoustic Triple-Modal Imaging

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 22, 期 11, 页码 2363-2375

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201200133

关键词

single-walled carbon nanotubes; protamine; mesenchymal stem cells; stem cell tracking; multimodal imaging

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) of China [2012CB932600, 2011CB911002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51132006, 51002100, 81171394]
  3. Natural Science Fund of Jiangsu Province [09KJB320016, SBK201122654]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem cells have shown great potential in regenerative medicine and attracted tremendous interests in recent years. Sensitive and reliable methods for stem cell labeling and in vivo tracking are thus urgently needed. Here, a novel approach to label human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) with single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) for in vivo tracking by triple-modal imaging is presented. It is shown that polyethylene glycol (PEG) functionalized SWNTs conjugated with protamine (SWNT-PEG-PRO) exhibit extremely efficient cell entry into hMSCs, without affecting their proliferation and differentiation. The strong inherent resonance Raman scattering of SWNTs is used for in vitro and in vivo Raman imaging of SWNT-PEG-PRO-labeled hMSCs, enabling ultrasensitive in vivo detection of as few as 500 stem cells administrated into mice. On the other hand, the metallic catalyst nanoparticles attached on nanotubes can be utilized as the T2-contrast agent in magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of SWNT-labeled hMSCs. Moreover, in vivo photoacoustic imaging of hMSCs in mice is also demonstrated. The work reveals that SWNTs with appropriate surface functionalization have the potential to serve as multifunctional nanoprobes for stem cell labeling and multi-modal in vivo tracking.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据