4.8 Article

Improved Efficiency in Blue Phosphorescent Organic Light-Emitting Devices Using Host Materials of Lower Triplet Energy than the Phosphorescent Blue Emitter

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 17, 页码 3250-3258

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201100586

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (US DOE) [M6743231, DE_AC06-76RLO 1830]
  2. Department of Energy's Office of Biological and Environmental Research
  3. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Data from a series of phosphorescent blue organic light-emitting devices with emissive layers consisting of either 4,4'-bis(N-carbazolyl)-2,2'-biphenyl (CBP):6% bis[(4,6-difluorophenyl) pyridinato-N,C-2](picolinato) iridium(III) (Flrpic) or bis(9-carbazolyl) benzene (mCP):6% Flrpic show that the triplet energy of the hole and electron transport layers can have a larger influence on the external quantum efficiency of an operating device than the triplet energy of the host material. A maximum external quantum efficiency of 14% was obtained for CBP: 6% Flrpic devices which is nearly double all other published CBP: 6% Flrpic results. A new host material, 4-(diphenylphosphoryl)-N,N-di-p-tolylaniline (DHM-A2), which has a triplet energy lower than that of Flrpic is also reported. Devices fabricated using DHM-A2 show improved performance (lower drive voltage and higher external quantum efficiency) over devices using 4-(diphenylphosphoryl)-N,N-diphenylaniline (HM-A1), a high performance ambipolar DHM-A2 analogue with a triplet energy greater than Flrpic. Nearly 18% external quantum efficiency was obtained for the DHM-A2:5% Flrpic devices. The results suggest modified design rules for the development of high performance host materials: more focus can be placed on molecular structures that provide good charge transport (ambipolarity for charge balance) and good molecular stability (for long lifetimes) rather than first focusing on the triplet energy of the host material.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据