4.8 Article

Mechanical Characterization of Amyloid Fibrils Using Coarse-Grained Normal Mode Analysis

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 18, 页码 3454-3463

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201002493

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2010-0026223, NRF-2011-0001145, NRF-2008-314-D00012]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2007-0056656, 2008-314-D00012, 과C6A1802, 2010-0026223, 314-2008-1-D00012] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent experimental studies have shown that amyloid fibril formed by aggregation of beta peptide exhibits excellent mechanical properties comparable to other protein materials such as actin filaments and microtubules. These excellent mechanical properties of amyloid fibrils are related to their functional role in disease expression. This indicates the necessity of understanding how an amyloid fibril achieves the remarkable mechanical properties through self-aggregation with structural hierarchy. However, the structure-property-function relationship still remains elusive. In this work, the mechanical properties of human islet amyloid polypeptide (hIAPP) are studied with respect to its structural hierarchies and structural shapes by coarse-grained normal mode analysis. The simulation shows that hIAPP fibril can achieve the excellent bending rigidity via specific aggregation patterns such as antiparallel stacking of beta peptides. Moreover, the length-dependent mechanical properties of amyloids are found. This length-dependent property has been elucidated from a Timoshenko beam model that takes into account the shear effect on the bending of amyloids. In summary, the study sheds light on the importance of not only the molecular architecture, which encodes the mechanical properties of the fibril, but also the shear effect on the mechanical (bending) behavior of the fibril.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据