4.8 Article

Investigation of Energy Transfer in Organic Photovoltaic Cells and Impact on Exciton Diffusion Length Measurements

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 21, 期 4, 页码 764-771

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201001928

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [DMR-0819885, DMR-1006566]
  2. University of Minnesota Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment
  3. 3M Company
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  5. Division Of Materials Research [1006566] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work demonstrates an approach for measuring the Forster radius of energy transfer between electron donating and accepting materials commonly used in organic photovoltaic cells (OPVs). While energy transfer processes are surprisingly common in OPVs, they are often incorrectly ignored in measurements of the exciton diffusion length and in models of device performance. Here, the efficiency of energy transfer between an emissive donor and an absorptive acceptor is investigated through complementary experimental and theoretical techniques. This is accomplished by spatially separating the donor and acceptor materials using a wide-energy-gap spacer layer to suppress direct charge transfer and tracking donor photoluminescence as a function of spacer layer thickness. Fitting experimental data obtained for a variety of donor materials allows for the extraction of Forster radii that are in good agreement with predicted values. The impact of donor-acceptor excitonic energy transfer on device performance and on measurements of the exciton diffusion length is also investigated using the archetypical small molecule donor material boron subphthalocyanine chloride (SubPc). An average exciton diffusion length of 7.7 nm is extracted from photoluminescence quenching experiments using SubPc. This value is independent of the quenching material when the role of energy transfer is properly modeled.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据