4.8 Article

Amplified Spontaneous Emission of Poly(ladder-type phenylene)s - The Influence of Photophysical Properties on ASE Thresholds

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 18, 期 20, 页码 3265-3275

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200800299

关键词

-

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  2. German Research Foundation
  3. Non-stipendiary Clare Hall College Research Fellowship of the Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Amplified spontaneous emission (ASE) of a series of blue-emitting poly(ladder-type phenylene)s (LPPP)s has been studied in thin film polymer waveguide structures. The chemically well-defined step-ladder polymers consist of an increasing number of bridged phenylene rings per monomer unit starting from fully arylated poly(ladder-type indenofluorene) up to poly (I adder-type pentaphenylene). The ASE characteristics of the polymers including the onset threshold values for ASE, the gain and loss coefficients as well as the photoluminescence (PL) properties, i.e., the solid state fluorescence lifetimes, decay kinetics and solid state quantum efficiencies have been studied by time-resolved PL spectroscopy. A fully arylated polyfluorene has been synthesized and its photophysical properties were compared to the step-ladder polymers. Steady-state photoinduced absorption and ultrafast transient absorption spectroscopy have been used to study excited state absorption of singlet and triplet states and polarons present in the solid state. The results demonstrate a minimum regarding the onset threshold value of ASE for a fully arylated poly (ladder-type indenofluorene) and a successive increase of the ASE threshold for the step-ladder polymers with more bridged phenylene rings. In particular, carbazole-containing step-ladder LPPPs exhibit significantly increased ASE threshold values as compared to their carbazole-free analogues due to a pronounced overlap of stimulated emission (SE) and photoinduced absorption (PA).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据