4.8 Article

Streptavidin-Functionalized Three-Dimensional Ordered Nanoporous Silica Film for Highly Efficient Chemiluminescent Immunosensing

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 18, 期 24, 页码 3991-3998

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200801022

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Health of Jiangsu Province [RC2007069]
  2. National Science Funds for Creative Research Groups [20521503]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20535010, 90713015]
  4. Social Development Projects of Jiangsu [BS2006006, BS2006074]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel biofunctionalized three-dimensional ordered nanoporous SiO2 film is designed for construction of chemiluminescent analytical devices. The nanoporous SiO2 film is prepared with self-assembly of polystyrene spheres as a template and 5-nm SiO2 nanoparticles on a glass slide followed by a calcination process. Its functionalization with streptavidin is achieved by using 3-glycidoxypropyltrimethoxysilane as a linker. Based on the high-selectivity recognition of streptavidin to biotin-labeled antibody a novel immunosensor is further constructed for highly efficient chemiluminescent immunoassay. The surface morphologies and fabrication processes of both the biofunctionalized film and the immunosensor are characterized using scanning electron microscopy, atomic-force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The three-dimensional ordered nanopores have high capacity for loading of streptavidin and antibody and promote the mass transport of immunoreagents for immunoreaction, thus the resulting chemiluminescent immunosensor shows wide dynamic range for fast immunoassay, and good reproducibility and stability. Using carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA 125) as a model, the highly efficient chemiluminescent immunosensing shows a linear range of three orders of magnitude, from 0.5 to 400 U mL(-1). This work provides a biofunctionalized porous nanostructure for promising biosensing applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据