4.7 Article

Uncovering unconscious memories and myths for understanding international tourism behavior

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH
卷 63, 期 4, 页码 372-383

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.04.020

关键词

Long interviews; Unconscious memory; Storytelling and myths; Japanese tourist behavior; Hawaii; Emic interpretations; Etic interpretations

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Growing evidence suggests unconscious thinking (e.g., [Bargh, John A., (2002), Losing consciousness: automatic influences on consumer judgement, behavior, and motivation. J Consum Res, 29 (2), 280-285.]) affects most decision-making. Tapping into this process requires a methodology that helps informants retrieve memories from their unconscious memories. Using McCracken's [McCracken, Grant, (1988), The long interview. Newbury Park: Sage.] long interview method, data are collected to demonstrate retrieval of subconscious myths and interpretations of their meanings. Levy [Levy, Sidney J. Interpreting consumer mythology: a structural approach to consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing 1981:45(3):49-61.] suggests that unconscious memories are stored as little myths-pieces of stories-and offers interpretive guidelines for analysis. Using a modified version of Levy's method, the paper interprets thick, written descriptions of long interviews of Japanese tourists visiting Hawaii's Big Island (BI). The results provide insights on Japanese tourist behavior inaccessible through conventional research methods. Both emic (self) and etic (researcher) interpretations of visitor experiences uncover important insights on leisure travel decisions and tourist behavior. Long interviews of Japanese tourists visiting Hawaii's Big Island are mapped and compared to the visitor's plans, motivations, decisions, and consequences. This paper extends Levy's [Levy, Sidney J. Interpreting consumer mythology: a structural approach to consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing 1981;45 (3):49-61.] methodology to expand understanding of the tourist decision-making process. (C) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据