4.2 Article

IGF-loaded silicon and zinc doped brushite cement: physico-mechanical characterization and in vivo osteogenesis evaluation

期刊

INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY
卷 7, 期 12, 页码 1561-1573

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1039/c5ib00114e

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [NIH 1R01AR066361, NIH 1R01EB007351]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR066361] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [R01EB007351] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dopants play critical roles in controlling the physical, mechanical, degradation kinetics, and in vivo properties of calcium phosphates. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of silicon (Si) and zinc (Zn) dopants on the physico-mechanical and in vivo osteogenesis properties of brushite cements (BrCs) alone and in combination with insulin like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Addition of 0.5 wt% Si did not alter the setting time, beta-TCP content, and compressive strength of BrCs significantly; however, 0.25 wt% Zn incorporation was accompanied by a significant decrease in mechanical strength from 4.78 +/- 0.21 MPa for pure BrC to 3.78 +/- 0.59 MPa and 3.28 +/- 0.22 MPa for Zn-BrC and Si/Zn-BrC, respectively. The in vivo bone regeneration properties of doped BrCs alone and in combination with IGF-1 were assessed and compared using chronological radiography, histology, scanning electron microscopy and fluorochrome labeling at 2 and 4 months post implantation in a rabbit femoral defect model. Based on in vivo characterization focusing on osteogenesis and vasculogenesis, Si-BrC and Si/Zn-BrC showed the best performance followed by Zn-BrC and pure BrCs. Addition of IGF-1 further improved bone regeneration. Our findings confirm that addition of Si and/or Zn alters the physico-mechanical properties of BrCs and promotes the early stage in vivo osseointegration and bone remodeling properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据