4.7 Review

Curb challenges of the Trojan Horse approach: Smart strategies in achieving effective yet safe cell-penetrating peptide-based drug delivery

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 65, 期 10, 页码 1299-1315

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.11.007

关键词

Cell-penetrating peptide (CPP); Drug delivery system; Prodrug; Targeted delivery; In vivo

资金

  1. NSFC, China [91029743, 81172996]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2013CB932503]
  3. Shanghai Pu-jiang Scholar Program
  4. School of Pharmacy, Fudan University
  5. Key Lab of Smart Drug Delivery (Fudan University)
  6. MOE PLA, China [SDD2011-02]
  7. NIH [CA114612]
  8. World Class University (WCU) project of the MEST [R31-2008-000-10103-01]
  9. NRF of South Korea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-penetrating peptide (CPP)-mediated intracellular drug delivery system, often specifically termed as the Trojan horse approach, has become the holy grail in achieving effective delivery of macromolecular compounds such as proteins, DNA, siRNAs, and drug carriers. It is characterized by the unique cell(or receptor-), temperature-, and payload-independent mechanisms, therefore offering potent means to improve poor cellular uptake of a variety of macromolecular drugs. Nevertheless, this Trojan horse approach also acts like a double-edged sword, causing serious safety and toxicity concerns to normal tissues or organs for in vivo application, due to lack of target selectivity of the powerful cell penetrating activity. To overcome this problem of potent yet non-selective penetration vs. targeting delivery, a number of smart strategies have been developed in recent years, including controllable CPP-based drug delivery systems based on various stimuli-responsive mechanisms. This review article provides a fundamental understanding of these smart systems, as well as a discussion of their real-time in vivo applicability. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据