4.7 Review

Applying macromolecular crowding to enhance extracellular matrix deposition and its remodeling in vitro for tissue engineering and cell-based therapies

期刊

ADVANCED DRUG DELIVERY REVIEWS
卷 63, 期 4-5, 页码 277-290

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2011.03.003

关键词

Microenvironment; Excluded volume effect; Stem cells; Differentiated cells; Matrix maturation; Collagen assembly

资金

  1. National Medical Research Council of Singapore (NMRC) [CPG/003/2004]
  2. Life Science Institute NUS
  3. Faculty of Engineering, Office of Research FRC [R-397-000-017-112, R-397-000-081-112]
  4. Office of Life Science [R-397-000-604-712]
  5. Provost of NUS [R-397-000-604-101]
  6. NUS-Baden-Wuerttemberg [R-397-000-080-646]
  7. Singapore MIT Alliance for Research Technology (SMART) Innovation Centre

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the advent of multicellular organisms, the exterior of the cells evolved dramatically from highly aqueous surroundings into an extracellular matrix and space crowded with macromolecules. Cell-based therapies require removal of cells from their crowded physiological context and propagating them in dilute culture medium to attain therapeutically relevant numbers whilst preserving their phenotype. However, bereft of their microenvironment, cells under perform and lose functionality. Major efforts currently aim to modify cell culture surfaces and build three dimensional scaffolds to improve this situation. We discuss here alternative strategies that enable cells to re-create their own microenvironment in vitro, using carbohydrate-based macromolecules as culture media additives that create an excluded volume effect at defined fraction volume occupancies. This biophysical approach dramatically enhances extracellular matrix deposition by differentiated cells and stem cells, and boosts progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation. We begin to understand how well cells really can perform ex vivo if given the chance. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据