4.4 Article

Hydrogen adsorption on microporous materials at ambient temperatures and pressures up to 50 MPa

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10450-012-9397-z

关键词

Hydrogen storage; Adsorption; Zeolite templated carbon; Metal organic framework; Activated carbon

资金

  1. General Motors
  2. National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High surface area microporous adsorbents are often proposed as potential hydrogen storage materials, although typically at 77 K and less than 5 MPa. In this study, we focus on conditions more suitable for automotive applications by investigating the storage capacities of microporous materials at 298 K and at pressures up to 50 MPa. In an effort to derive trends within and across material classes, we examined a wide range of materials with varying microstructures including the activated carbons AX-21, KUA-5, and MSC-30; a zeolite templated carbon; a hypercrosslinked polymer; and the Metal Organic Frameworks MOF-177, IRMOF-20, MIL-53, ZIF-8, and Cu-3(btc)(2). The peak excess adsorption of these materials ranged from 0.8-1.8 wt.%, although many did not reach their maximum capacity even at high pressures. However, the total volumetric storage gains over compressed hydrogen gas were quite low and, in many cases, negative. In addressing ambient temperature adsorption at significantly higher pressures than previously reported, our data confirms and extends the range of validity of several existing DFT calculations. Furthermore, our data suggest that, for both activated carbons and MOFs, factors other than specific surface area govern ambient temperature adsorption capacity. Contrary to some reports, the high fractions of sub-nanometer pores in some of the investigated MOFs did not appear to enhance the excess adsorption even at high pressures. For on-board applications with ambient temperature storage, significant enhancements to the attractive force at the materials' surface are required, beyond merely increasing specific surface area, or for MOFs, tuning of pore sizes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据