4.4 Article

Effect of Textural Properties on the Adsorption and Desorption of Toluene on the Metal-Organic Frameworks HKUST-1 and MIL-101

期刊

ADSORPTION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 4, 页码 325-339

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1260/0263-6174.31.4.325

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20936001, 21006031]
  2. Science & Technology Foundation of Guangdong Province [2002C32103]
  3. State Key Lab of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology [C710090Z]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adsorption and desorption of toluene on metal-organic frameworks HKUST-1 and MIL-101 were studied. The adsorption isotherms and kinetic curves of toluene on HKUST-1 and MIL-101 were separately measured by gravimetric method. Temperature-programmed desorption experiments were carried out for estimating the interaction of toluene with the surfaces of HKUST-1 and MIL-101. Our experimental results showed that the isotherms of toluene on the adsorbents were well fitted by the Langmuir-Freundlich equation. The maximum amount of toluene adsorbed on MIL-101 was 15.1 mmol/g, which was much higher than that adsorbed on HKUST-1 (6.6 mmol/g). The high adsorption capacity of MIL-101 can be attributed to its higher surface area. However, the isotherm of toluene at P/P-0 < 0.09 on HKUST-1 was much higher than that on MIL-101 owing to the smaller pore size of HKUST-1. It is suggested that HKUST-1 had better adsorption performance than MIL-101 at low concentration of volatile organic compounds. The desorption activation energies, E-d, of toluene on HKUST-1 and MIL-101 were 43.8 and 30.2 kJ/mol, respectively, meaning that the interaction of toluene with HKUST-1 was stronger than that with MIL-101. In addition, the diffusion coefficient of toluene within HKUST-1 was smaller than that within MIL-101. Results of thermal desorption experiments showed that the desorption efficiency of toluene from HKUST-1 and MIL-101 can separately reach above 93% and nearly 100% at 393 K, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据