4.8 Article

Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

期刊

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
卷 362, 期 17, 页码 1563-1574

出版社

MASSACHUSETTS MEDICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1001282

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [N01-HC-95178, N01-HC-95179, N01-HC-95180, N01-HC-95181, N01-HC-95182, N01-HC-95183, N01-HC-95184, IAAY1-HC-9035, IAAY1-HC-1010]
  2. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  3. National Institute on Aging
  4. National Eye Institute
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  6. General Clinical Research Centers
  7. Merck
  8. Merck Schering-Plough
  9. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Abbott
  12. Roche
  13. Isis/Genzyme
  14. GlaxoSmithKline
  15. Novartis
  16. Pfizer
  17. Regeneron/Sanofi-Aventis
  18. National Lipid Association
  19. Solvay
  20. Novo Nordisk
  21. Amylin
  22. Becton Dickinson
  23. Eli Lilly
  24. Hoffmann-La Roche
  25. GlycoMark
  26. Wyeth
  27. Daiichi Sankyo
  28. Bayhill Therapeutics
  29. LipoScience
  30. MannKind
  31. Veritas
  32. MicroIslet
  33. Exsulin
  34. GI Dynamics
  35. Medtronic
  36. Tolerex
  37. Osiris
  38. Halozyme
  39. InterKrin
  40. Sanofi-Aventis
  41. Dexcom
  42. Johnson Johnson
  43. Fujisawa
  44. Takeda
  45. King
  46. DaiichiSankyo
  47. Gilead
  48. Theravance
  49. Pharmacopeia
  50. Sciele

向作者/读者索取更多资源

BACKGROUND We investigated whether combination therapy with a statin plus a fibrate, as compared with statin monotherapy, would reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were at high risk for cardiovascular disease. METHODS We randomly assigned 5518 patients with type 2 diabetes who were being treated with open-label simvastatin to receive either masked fenofibrate or placebo. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes. The mean follow-up was 4.7 years. RESULTS The annual rate of the primary outcome was 2.2% in the fenofibrate group and 2.4% in the placebo group (hazard ratio in the fenofibrate group, 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79 to 1.08; P = 0.32). There were also no significant differences between the two study groups with respect to any secondary outcome. Annual rates of death were 1.5% in the fenofibrate group and 1.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.10; P = 0.33). Prespecified subgroup analyses suggested heterogeneity in treatment effect according to sex, with a benefit for men and possible harm for women (P = 0.01 for interaction), and a possible interaction according to lipid subgroup, with a possible benefit for patients with both a high baseline triglyceride level and a low baseline level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P = 0.057 for interaction). CONCLUSIONS The combination of fenofibrate and simvastatin did not reduce the rate of fatal cardiovascular events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke, as compared with simvastatin alone. These results do not support the routine use of combination therapy with fenofibrate and simvastatin to reduce cardiovascular risk in the majority of high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00000620.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据