4.1 Article

Acquisition and reinstatement of MDMA-induced conditioned place preference in mice pre-treated with MDMA or cocaine during adolescence

期刊

ADDICTION BIOLOGY
卷 14, 期 4, 页码 447-456

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2009.00173.x

关键词

Adolescence; cocaine; CPP; MDMA; mice; reinstatement

资金

  1. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Direccion General de Investigacion [PSI2008-00101/PSIC]
  2. Instituto de Salud 'Carlos III' (FIS)
  3. RETICS
  4. Red de Trastornos Adictivos [RD06/001/0016]
  5. Generalitat Valenciana
  6. Conselleria de Educacion [PROMETEO/2009/072]
  7. Agencia Valenciana de Salud. Direccion General de Drogodependencias (FEPAD), Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Those who take ecstasy are more likely to consume other drugs than non-users with cocaine abuse being reported by 75.5% of high school student MDMA (+/- 3,4-methylenedioxymetamphetamine hydrochloride) users. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effects of exposure during adolescence to MDMA, cocaine or to both drugs on the MDMA-induced conditioned place preference (CPP) in adult mice. Animals received two daily administrations of saline, 10 mg/kg of MDMA, 25 mg/kg of cocaine or 10 mg/kg of MDMA plus 25 mg/kg of cocaine over 3 days (from PD28 to 30). Three weeks after pre-treatment, the MDMA-induced CPP procedure was initiated (PD52). Acquisition of CPP was induced with a sub-threshold dose of MDMA (1.25 mg/kg) only in animals treated during adolescence with MDMA alone. Preference was established in all the groups after conditioning with 10 mg/kg of MDMA, while the time required to achieve extinction was longer in those pre-treated with cocaine or MDMA alone (46 and 28 sessions, respectively). Moreover, preference was reinstated with progressively lower priming doses of MDMA in mice pre-treated with MDMA or cocaine alone. These results demonstrate that early exposure to MDMA or cocaine induces long-lasting changes that last until adulthood and modify the response of animals to MDMA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据