4.6 Article

Adolescent alcohol use: a reflection of national drinking patterns and policy?

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 109, 期 11, 页码 1857-1868

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/add.12681

关键词

Adolescents; alcohol control policies; alcohol use; country-level predictors; cross-national studies; minimum purchasing age

资金

  1. Nordea Foundation [02-2011-0122]
  2. Medical Research Council [MR/K023195/1B, MR/K023195/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

AimsTo analyse how adolescent drunkenness and frequency of drinking were associated with adult drinking patterns and alcohol control policies. Design, Setting and ParticipantsCross-sectional survey data on 13- and 15-year-olds in 37 countries who participated in the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study in 2010 (n=144788) were linked to national-level indicators on alcohol control policies and adult drinking patterns. MeasurementsOutcome measures were self-reported weekly drinking and life-time drunkenness (drunk once or more). Data were analysed using multi-level logistic regression models. FindingsIn the mutually adjusted models, adolescent drunkenness was associated significantly with high adult alcohol consumption [odds ratio (OR)=3.15 among boys, 95% confidence interval (CI)=2.13-4.64, OR girls=2.44, CI=1.57-3.80] and risky drinking patterns in the adult population (OR boys=2.02, CI=1.33-3.05, OR girls=1.61, CI=1.18-2.18). The level of abstainers in the adult population was also associated significantly with girls' drunkenness; a 10% increase in the number of abstainers in a country reduced the odds of drunkenness with 21% (OR=0.79, CI=0.68-0.90). Weekly drinking was associated significantly with weak restrictions on availability (OR boys=2.82, CI=1.74-4.54, OR girls=2.00, CI=1.15-3.46) and advertising (OR boys=1.56, CI=1.02-2.40, OR girls=1.79, CI=1.10-2.94). ConclusionsComparing data cross-nationally, high levels of adult alcohol consumption and limited alcohol control policies are associated with high levels of alcohol use among adolescents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据