4.6 Article

Twenty-five years of volatile substance abuse mortality: a national mortality surveillance programme

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 108, 期 2, 页码 385-393

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.04047.x

关键词

Aerosols; gas fuels; glues; mortality; solvents; volatile substance abuse

资金

  1. charity Re-Solv through Big Lottery
  2. Department of Health
  3. GSK
  4. Medical Research Council [G0801056B] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims To investigate trends in volatile substance abuse (VSA) deaths over 25 years. Design A national mortality surveillance programme with standardised data collection procedures. Setting The UK and islands. Participants/Measurements All VSA deaths, 19832007. Findings In the five quinquennia from 1983 to 2007 the numbers of VSA deaths were 499, 609, 378, 349 and 258 respectively. There were gradual increases in the mean age at death in males and females and in the number of VSA deaths in women. Coincident with the 1992 Department of Health Advertising Campaign, VSA deaths in boys and girls (<18 years of age) fell by an estimated 56% (95% CI: 36%70%) and 64% (20%84%), respectively, from the underlying trend, but there was no evidence of any similar step change in either group following the 1999 Legislation prohibiting sales of cigarette lighter refills containing butane to those under the age of 18 years. Between 19831987 and 20032007, the ratio of aerosol to gas fuel deaths fell by an estimated 80% (57% to 91%) in adults, while the ratio of glue to gas fuel deaths fell by an estimated 95% (89% to 97%) in adults and an estimated 87% (-1% to 98%) in children. Conclusions Between 1983 and 2007, in the United Kingdom, the numbers of deaths associated with volatile substance abuse peaked in the early 1990s and fell to their lowest level in the mid-2000s. The age at death increased in both males and females. There was a fall in the proportion of volatile substance abuse deaths involving glues and a rise, particularly in adults, in the proportion involving gas fuels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据