4.6 Article

Non-medical prescription use increases the risk for the onset and recurrence of psychopathology: results from the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 106, 期 12, 页码 2146-2155

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03520.x

关键词

Analgesics; benzodiazepines; CNS stimulants; non-medical prescription use; opioid; psychopathology; sedatives

资金

  1. Research Enhancement Program
  2. Texas State University
  3. National Institute on Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aims Given the rising rates of the non-medical use of prescription medications (NUPM) and strong cross-sectional associations between psychopathology and NUPM, we examined whether a history of NUPM increased the risk for onset and recurrence of psychopathology. Design Longitudinal data are from waves 1 and 2 of the National Epidemiological Survey on Alcoholism and Related Conditions (NESARC). Setting The NESARC is a nation-wide, household-based survey. Participants A total of 34 653 US resident participants who completed both NESARC waves were included in analyses. Measurements Primary measures were history of NUPM and Axis I psychopathology at wave 1. Wave 1 personality disorder diagnosis and sociodemographic characteristics were used as control variables. Findings Design-based logistic regression analyses indicated that life-time and past year NUPM at wave 1 increased risk for onset of psychopathology among those with no history of psychopathology at baseline, with particular risk for non-NUPM substance use and bipolar disorders. Life-time and past year NUPM were associated with recurrence of alcohol and non-NUPM substance use disorders among those with these diagnoses at baseline. In contrast, life-time and past year NUPM was associated with the onset of all examined disorders among those with a different diagnosis at baseline. Conclusions Non-medical use of prescription medications is a consistent risk factor for the onset and recurrence of psychopathology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据