4.6 Article

Repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex reduces cigarette craving and consumption

期刊

ADDICTION
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 653-660

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02448.x

关键词

Craving; DLPFC; nicotine; smoking; TMS

资金

  1. Rosenzweig-Coopersmith Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To evaluate the effect of repeated high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), combined with either smoking or neutral cues, on cigarette consumption, dependence and craving. Participants were divided randomly to real and sham stimulation groups. Each group was subdivided randomly into two subgroups presented with either smoking-related or neutral pictures just before the daily TMS intervention. Ten daily rTMS sessions were applied every week-day and then a maintenance phase was conducted in which rTMS sessions were less frequent. Single-site, out-patient, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled. Forty-eight chronic smokers who smoked at least 20 cigarettes per day and were motivated to quit smoking. Healthy males and females were recruited from the general population using advertisements in newspapers and on internet websites. Ten daily rTMS sessions were administered using a standard figure-8 coil over the DLPFC. Stimulation included 20 trains/day at 100% of motor threshold. Each train consisted of 50 pulses at 10 Hz with an inter-train interval of 15 seconds. Cigarette consumption was evaluated objectively by measuring cotinine levels in urine samples and subjectively by participants' self-reports. Dependence and craving were evaluated by standard questionnaires. Ten daily rTMS sessions over the DLPFC reduced cigarette consumption and nicotine dependence. Furthermore, treatment blocked the craving induced by daily presentation of smoking-related pictures. However, these effects tended to dissipate over time. Multiple high-frequency rTMS of the DLPFC can attenuate nicotine craving.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据