4.4 Article

Conventional and Conservation Tillage: Influence on Seasonal Runoff, Sediment, and Nutrient Losses in the Canadian Prairies

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
卷 39, 期 3, 页码 964-980

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2009.0219

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
  2. Environment Canada
  3. Ducks Unlimited Canada

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conservation tillage has been widely promoted to reduce sediment and nun tent crampon from agricultural fields However, the effect of conservation tillage on sediment and nutrient export in snowmelt-dominated climates is nor well known. Therefore, a long-term paired watershed study was used to compare sediment and nutrient losses from a conventional and a conservation tillage watershed in the Northern Great Plains region of western Canada During the treatment period, dissolved nutrient concentrations were typically greater doting spring snowmelt than during summer rainfall events, whereas concentrations of sediment and particulate nutrients were greatest during rainfall events However, because total runoff was dominated by snowmelt, most sediment and nutrient export occurred during snowmelt Overall, conservation tillage reduced the export of sediment in runoff water by 65%. Similarly, concentrations and export of nitrogen were reduced by 41 and 68%, respectively, relative to conventional After conversion to conservation tillage, concentrations and exports of phosphorus (P) increased by 42 and 12%, respectively, with soluble P accounting for the majority of he exported P, especially during snowmelt Our results suggest that management practices designed to Improve water quality by reducing sediment and sediment-bound nutrient export from agricultural fields and watersheds can be less effective in cold, dry regions where nutrient export is primarily snowmelt driven and in the dissolved form In these situations, it may be more appropriate to implement management practices that reduce the accumulation of nutrients in crop residues and the surface soil

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据