4.1 Article

Ontogenetic scaling of scansorial surface area and setal dimensions of Chondrodactylus bibronii (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): testing predictions derived from cross-species comparisons of gekkotans

期刊

ACTA ZOOLOGICA
卷 90, 期 1, 页码 18-29

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00324.x

关键词

Gekkota; adhesion; growth; locomotion; setae

资金

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery
  2. Alberta Ingenuity Studentship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Webster, N.B., Johnson, M.K. and Russell, A. P. 2009. Ontogenetic scaling of scansorial surface area and setal dimensions of Chondrodactylus bibronii (Gekkota: Gekkonidae): testing predictions derived from cross-species comparisons of gekkotans. - Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 90: 18-29 Little is known of how the adhesive apparatus of gekkotans scales with growth. Cross-species comparisons of certain characteristics, using size as a comparator to investigate scaling relationships, suggest certain relationships between subdigital pad area and body size. The manner in which the adhesive apparatus grows and scales within any one species, however, remains unknown, and it is unclear whether interspecific and intraspecific patterns are similar. To address this, we examined a post-hatching ontogenetic series of the southern African gecko Chondrodactylus bibronii and demonstrate that setal density, setal basal diameter and setal spacing remain relatively constant in relation to size, indicating conserved subdigital pad assembly rules that are independent of size. Conversely, however, average and maximal setal lengths increase slightly and isometrically with size, an outcome that is probably explained by setal row recruitment, and the surface area of the subdigital pads scales close to, but below, isometry with respect to body mass and snout-vent length, it therefore does not increase sufficiently with size to compensate for the increase in mass. As a result, relative adhesive capacity decreases with growth with a regression slope of -0.45.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据