4.4 Article

Resource partitioning based on body size contributes to the species diversity of wood-boring beetles and arboreal nesting ants

期刊

INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 4-12

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/icad.12136

关键词

Arthropods; dead wood; niche differentiation; resource size; species coexistence; species packing

资金

  1. Shimoda Marine Research Center, University of Tsukuba
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI program [24780144, 25450483]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25450483] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

1. The need to understand the mechanisms enhancing species coexistence and diversity is one of the central issues of community ecology. Theoretical work suggests that resource partitioning based on body size contributes to the coexistence of competing species, resulting in increased species diversity. Nevertheless, few empirical studies have investigated this. The species composition of wood-dwelling arthropods was surveyed to examine resource partitioning based on body size in the dead wood of the ubame oak (Quercus phillyraeoides A. Grey) trees. 2. Greater resource sizes (larger dead wood diameter) retained a lower overall density of wood-dwelling beetles per resource volume, greater total beetle biomass per resource volume and larger bodied individuals of the dominant species (Cerambycidae; Anaglyptus nipponensis Bates). A gradient in the species composition of arboreal ant assemblages along resource size and a positive correlation between resource size and ant body size was observed. These results suggest that the incidence of wood-boring beetles was limited by the size of the available resource, resulting in resource partitioning by the ants according to the sizes of galleries made by the beetles. 3. Our findings indicate that resource size leads both directly and indirectly to body size-dependent resource partitioning in beetle and ant assemblages, and contributes to the maintenance of species coexistence in the assemblages present in dead wood.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据