4.5 Article

Plasmodium falciparum populations from northeastern Myanmar display high levels of genetic diversity at multiple antigenic loci

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 125, 期 1, 页码 53-59

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.09.008

关键词

Plasmodium falciparum; Antigenic diversity; Border malaria; Multiplicity of infection

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [1R01AI075429]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30960050, 81161120421]
  3. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH [U19AI089672]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Levels of genetic diversity of the malaria parasites and multiclonal infections are correlated with transmission intensity. In order to monitor the effect of strengthened malaria control efforts in recent years at the China-Myanmar border area, we followed the temporal dynamics of genetic diversity of three polymorphic antigenic markers msp1, msp2, and glurp in the Plasmodium falciparum populations. Despite reduced malaria prevalence in the region, parasite populations exhibited high levels of genetic diversity. Genotyping 258 clinical samples collected in four years detected a total of 22 PCR size alleles. Multiclonal infections were detected in 45.7% of the patient samples, giving a minimum multiplicity of infection of 1.41. The majority of alleles experienced significant temporal fluctuations through the years. Haplotype diversity based on the three-locus genotypes ranged from the lowest in 2009 at 0.33 to the highest in 2010 at 0.80. Sequencing of msp1 fragments from 36 random samples of five allele size groups detected 13 different sequences, revealing an additional layer of genetic complexity. This study suggests that despite reduced prevalence of malaria infections in this region, the parasite population size and transmission intensity remained high enough to allow effective genetic recombination of the parasites and continued maintenance of genetic diversity. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据