4.5 Article

Haplotype identification within Trypanosoma cruzi I in Colombian isolates from several reservoirs, vectors and humans

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 110, 期 1, 页码 15-21

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.12.003

关键词

Trypanosoma cruzi I; Primer; Haplotype; Polymorphism; Miniexon gene; Phylogeny

资金

  1. Colciencias project [1204-343-19188]
  2. Congenital Chagas Disease Study group [1109-04-18231]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Genetic variability in the Trypanosome cruzi I group has recently been revealed in Colombian isolates from humans, reservoirs and vectors. Genomic rearrangements and the polymorphic regions in taxonomic markers, such as the miniexon gene, have led to the development of molecular tools to identify phylogenetic haplotypes in T. cruzi isolates. From genetic polymorphisms found in T. cruzi 1 isolates, they have been classified into four haplotypes according to their epidemiologic transmission cycles. Haplotype la is associated with domestic isolates, from Rhodnius prolixus; haplotype Ib, with the domestic and peridomestic cycle, mainly associated with Triatoma dimidiata; haplotype Ic is a poorly characterized group, which has been associated with the peridomestic cycle; and haplotype Id has been related to the sylvatic cycle. In order to demonstrate that the circulating T cruzi 1 isolates in Colombia can be classified in the four proposed haplotypes, specific primers were designed on polymorphic regions of the miniexon gene's intergenic sequences. This set of primers allowed the molecular characterization of 33 Colombian isolates, classifying them into three of the four proposed haplotypes (la, Ib and Id). Results obtained from maximum parsimony and maximum-likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses correlated with the molecular classification of the isolates and their transmission cycles. This study brings insights into the Chagas disease epidemiology and the parasite's transmission dynamics. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据