4.5 Article

Brazilian studies on the genetics of Schistosoma mansoni

期刊

ACTA TROPICA
卷 108, 期 2-3, 页码 175-178

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2008.09.003

关键词

Schistosoma mansoni; Genetics; Microsatellites; Genetic marker; Population genetics

资金

  1. CNPq [472152/04-1]
  2. FAPERJ [E-261170.971/2004]
  3. FIOCRUZ (PAPES)
  4. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz.
  5. NIH [5D43TWO07012-03, 5RO3TWO07358-02]
  6. WHO/TDR [A60251]
  7. CNPq/FIOCRUZ [400315/2006-8]
  8. FAPEMIG [REDE-2829/05]
  9. EDT [17001/01, 5323-4.01/07]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The parasite Schistosoma is known to exhibit variations among species, strains and genera, such as, the levels of infectivity, pathogenicity and immunogenicity. These factors may differ among parasite populations according to the local epidemiological conditions. Diversity observed in Schistosoma mansoni from different geographical regions or within individuals of the same region can be determined by differences in the genotype of each parasite strain. However, until recently, finding adequate genetic markers to investigate infectivity or other epidemiological characteristics of a transmission area proved difficult. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the genetic variability of S. mansoni, using different techniques. Intraspecific variability was observed in morphological characters, isoenzyme studies, mtDNA, ribosomal gene probes, random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and microsatellites. The sequencing of the S. mansoni genome was the most important achievement concerning genetic approaches to the study of this parasite and may improve the development of drugs, vaccines and diagnostics of schistosomiasis. The knowledge of the genetic structure of schistosome populations in relation to epidemiological data and host variability is essential for the understanding of the epidemiology of the disease and the design of control strategies. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据