3.9 Article

Is footprint shape a good predictor of arboreality in sigmondontine rodents from a neotropical savanna?

期刊

ACTA THERIOLOGICA
卷 57, 期 3, 页码 261-267

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-011-0069-2

关键词

Cricetidae; Cerrado; Geometric morphometrics; Locomotory mode; Vertical stratification

类别

资金

  1. CNPq [308153/2007-3, 483117/2009-9]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigated the relation between the footprint shape of the fore and hind feet of sigmodontine rodents and their levels of arboreal activity. Footprint shape was obtained by analyzing the impressions left by identified animals captured in the field after being forced to pass through ink-tracking tunnels or by pressing their previously inked feet on a paper sheet. We used geometric morphometric techniques that use superimposition of landmarks (centers of the pads) to obtain footprint shape variables, which were reduced using multivariate analysis (principal component analysis). Arboreal activity was inferred on the basis of the proportions of individuals captured in arboreal traps (1.5-2.5 m height). Regression analysis of body size and the variable that best represented the footprint shapes (first principal component-PC1) did not indicate significant allometric effects on such shapes. We did not detect any significant phylogenetic effects on the arboreal activity of the rodents, either. The results indicated that the PC1 concerning footprint shapes of ten sigmodontine rodents efficiently reflects the degree of use of arboreal strata by these animals. The species studied showed different levels of arboreal activity and their hind footprints (r(2) = 0.94) were better indicators of arboreality than the fore footprints (r(2) = 0.53). These findings suggest a likely trade off for the fore feet functions. Such functions are probably not strictly related to locomotion. Other biomechanical functions (e.g., shock absorption) and/or manipulation (e.g., food manipulation and grooming) may exert relatively greater influence on the shape of fore feet.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据