3.9 Article

Annual use of water sources by reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis canadensis: effects of season and drought

期刊

ACTA THERIOLOGICA
卷 54, 期 2, 页码 127-136

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/BF03193168

关键词

Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep; Great Basin; motion-sensor cameras; reintroduction; water

类别

资金

  1. Utah Division of Wildlife Resources
  2. Utah Chapter of the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep
  3. Minnesota Chapter of the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep
  4. National Chapter of the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep
  5. U.S. Forest Service
  6. U.S. Department of Defense
  7. Antelope Island State Park
  8. Brigham Young University
  9. Department of Biological Sciences at Idaho State University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Water sources are important for the conservation and management of bighorn sheep Ovis canadensis (Shaw, 1804). Little is known, however, regarding the use of water by reintroduced Rocky Mountain bighorns O. c. canadensis (Shaw, 1804). Our purpose was to quantify use of water sources by bighorns to test hypotheses related to the value of these sites on Antelope Island, Utah, USA, from July 2005 to December 2006. We predicted that bighorns would increase the number and duration of visits to water during summer. Moreover, we predicted that animals would visit and spend more time at water during drought. Our results indicate that bighorns visited and spent more time around water in summer. These animals, however, did not visit and spend more time at water during drought. Nevertheless, use of water sources increased during times of similar precipitation that followed drought, indicating a potential time-lag in water use by bighorns. Our results underscore the importance of water for reintroduced bighorns in the deserts of western USA, and indicate that animals congregate in riparian areas near water and thereby may facilitate the spreading of diseases and parasites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据