4.2 Article

Apparent diffusion coefficient for lymph node characterization after chemoradiation therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer

期刊

ACTA RADIOLOGICA
卷 56, 期 12, 页码 1446-1453

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0284185114560936

关键词

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; lymph node; lymphatic metastasis; rectum; neoplasm

资金

  1. Inje University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Because further treatment plans depends on lymph node (LN) status after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (CRT), the accurate characterization of LN is important. Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for LN characterization after CRT and to compare the performance with that of LN size. Material and Methods: Fifty-three patients (36 men, 17 women; mean age, 58 years; age range, 34-79 years) who underwent CRT and subsequent surgery were included. All patients underwent 1.5-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Each regional LN on post-CRT MRI was identified in consensus by two radiologists after reviewing the pre-CRT MRI. The ADC value and size in each LN was measured. To compare the mean ADC values and sizes of the metastatic and non-metastatic LNs after CRT, the t-test was used. To calculate the performance, a ROC curve analysis was performed. The histopathological examinations served as the reference standard. Results: A total of 115 LNs (29 metastatic and 86 non-metastatic) were matched and analyzed. The mean ADC of the metastatic LNs was significantly higher than that of the non-metastatic LNs (1.36 +/- 0.27 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s; 1.13 +/- 0.23 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s, P < 0.0001). The mean size of the metastatic LNs was also significantly larger than that of the non-metastatic LNs (5.6 +/- 3.1; 3.9 +/- 1.2, P = 0.0078). There was no significant difference between the areas under the curve of the ADC and size (0.742 [95% CI, 0.652-0.819]; 0.680 [0.586-0.764], respectively, P = 0.4090). Conclusion: The performance of ADC for LN characterization after CRT was comparable to that of LN size.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据