4.5 Review

Clozapine as a first- or second-line treatment in schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 138, 期 4, 页码 281-288

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12954

关键词

schizophrenia; first-episode; antipsychotics; meta-analysis

资金

  1. Alkermes
  2. Minerva Neuroscience
  3. Gedeon Richter
  4. Otsuka
  5. Otsuka/Lundbeck
  6. Janssen-Cilag
  7. Lundbeck

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: No consensus exists on whether clozapine should be prescribed in early stages of psychosis. This systematic review and meta-analysis therefore focus on the use of clozapine as first-line or second-line treatment in non-treatment-resistant patients. Methods: Articles were eligible if they investigated clozapine compared to another antipsychotic as a first- or second-line treatment in non-treatment-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SCZ) patients and provided data on treatment response. We performed random-effects meta-analyses. Results: Fifteen articles were eligible for the systematic review (N = 314 subjects on clozapine and N = 800 on other antipsychotics). Our meta-analysis comparing clozapine to a miscellaneous group of antipsychotics revealed a significant benefit of clozapine (Hedges' g = 0.220, P = 0.026, 95% CI = 0.026-0.414), with no evidence of heterogeneity. In addition, a sensitivity analysis revealed a significant benefit of clozapine over risperidone (Hedges' g = 0.274, P = 0.030, 95% CI = 0.027-0.521). Conclusion: The few eligible trials on this topic suggest that clozapine may be more effective than other antipsychotics when used as first- or second-line treatment. Only large clinical trials may comprehensively probe disease stage-dependent superiority of clozapine and investigate overall tolerability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据