4.5 Article

Motivational and neurocognitive deficits are central to the prediction of longitudinal functional outcome in schizophrenia

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 130, 期 4, 页码 290-299

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12289

关键词

schizophrenia; functional outcome; negative symptoms; neurocognition; amotivation; avolition-apathy

资金

  1. NIMH [N01MH90001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

ObjectiveFunctional impairment is characteristic of most individuals with schizophrenia; however, the key variables that undermine community functioning are not well understood. This study evaluated the association between selected clinical variables and one-year longitudinal functional outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. MethodThe sample included 754 patients with schizophrenia who completed both baseline and one-year follow-up visits in the CATIE study. Patients were evaluated with a comprehensive battery of assessments capturing symptom severity and cognitive performance among other variables. The primary outcome variable was functional status one-year postbaseline measured using the Heinrichs-Carpenter Quality of Life Scale. ResultsFactor analysis of negative symptom items revealed two factors reflecting diminished expression and amotivation. Multivariate regression modeling revealed several significant independent predictors of longitudinal functioning scores. The strongest predictors were baseline amotivation and neurocognition. Both amotivation and neurocognition also had independent predictive value for each of the domains of functioning assessed (e.g., vocational). ConclusionBoth motivational and neurocognitive deficits independently contribute to longitudinal functional outcomes assessed 1year later among patients with schizophrenia. Both of these domains of psychopathology impede functional recovery; hence, it follows that treatments ameliorating each of these symptoms should promote community functioning among individuals with schizophrenia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据