4.5 Review

Resilience in mental health: linking psychological and neurobiological perspectives

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 128, 期 1, 页码 3-20

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12095

关键词

resilience; mental health; psychiatry; epidemiology; neurobiology

资金

  1. VENI Award from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [916.11.086]
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO, VENI Grant) [916.76.147]
  3. ZON-MW [171001002]
  4. European Community [HEALTH-F2-2009-241909]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To review the literature on psychological and biological findings on resilience (i.e. the successful adaptation and swift recovery after experiencing life adversities) at the level of the individual, and to integrate findings from animal and human studies. Method Electronic and manual literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and PSYCHINFO, using a range of search terms around biological and psychological factors influencing resilience as observed in human and experimental animal studies, complemented by review articles and cross-references. Results The term resilience is used in the literature for different phenomena ranging from prevention of mental health disturbance to successful adaptation and swift recovery after experiencing life adversities, and may also include post-traumatic psychological growth. Secure attachment, experiencing positive emotions and having a purpose in life are three important psychological building blocks of resilience. Overlap between psychological and biological findings on resilience in the literature is most apparent for the topic of stress sensitivity, although recent results suggest a crucial role for reward experience in resilience. Conclusion Improving the understanding of the links between genetic endowment, environmental impact and gene-environment interactions with developmental psychology and biology is crucial for elucidating the neurobiological and psychological underpinnings of resilience.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据